The Qing Constitution
The Last Gasp of a Dying Dynasty
The first dramatic gesture in the direction of
constitutional reform was made by the empress dowager Cixi in 1905,
when she ordered the formation of a small study group of five princes
and officials — three Manchus and two Chinese — who would travel to
Japan, the United States, Britain, France, Germany, Russia, and Italy
to study their governments. ... Upon returning to China, it
recommended to the empress dowager that some kind of constitutional
reform be implemented and suggested Japan as the most effective model,
since there the reigning imperial family had been maintained in power.
In November 1906 the empress dowager issued an edict promising to
prepare a constitution and reform the administrative structure of China
by reshaping the existing ministries and adding new ones, by curbing
the powers of the governors-general, and by convening a national
assembly. It was only eight years since Emperor Guangxu and his
supporters had been prevented from pushing through much milder reforms,
but the crisis was now so clear that the empress dowager’s decision was
widely accepted by both Manchu and Chinese officials. (SMC, 235)

In late 1908 the court announced that full constitutional government would
be established over the next nine-year period, the same time span for
change that had been followed by the Japanese after the Meiji
Restoration of 1868. Although the Qing emperor was to maintain almost
total power over the new parliamentary structure, the budget, the armed
forces, foreign policy, and the judicial system, the need for a working
system of electoral government at the central, provincial, and local
levels was now accepted. The death of the empress dowager Cixi in
November 1908, which followed by one day the death of the unfortunate
emperor Guangxu — still under palace detention after his failed reform
attempt of a decade before — did not deflect the general direction of
reform. If anything it increased the sense of urgency, since the Manchu
regents for the new emperor, Puyi — a baby at his accession, like his
two predecessors — formed an advisory cabinet packed with Manchus,
foolishly failing to see that this would heighten Chinese suspicions
that the whole system of constitutional reform was going to be
manipulated to protect the ruling dynasty. (SMC, 237)
|

The Cost of Change ...
The Manchu’s position was extraordinarily
difficult. With the banner garrisons being slowly cut back or
reassigned to civilian occupations and the planned New Army not yet
under complete central control or up to full strength, the Qing had no
clear military dominance over the country. Each fresh
initiative — schools, public-works projects, diplomatic establishments
overseas — brought rocketing expenses. ...
Reparations extracted from China by foreign powers, after successive defeats:
(Note that the value of an ounce of silver varied widely over
time; in 1887 it was worth U.S. $1.20 but by 1902 it had fallen to
$0.62.)
|
.
1842 |
21 million ounces of silver to Great Britain at the end of the 1839-1842 war |
1858 |
4 million ounces of silver to Britain and 2 million ounces to France |
1860 |
8 million ounces of silver to Britain and 8 million ounces to France |
1862-9 |
Approximately 400,000 ounces of indemnities cumulatively for violence against missionaries |
1870 |
490,000 ounces of silver to France after the Tientsin massacre |
1873 |
500,000 ounces of silver to Japan after the Japanese expedition to Taiwan |
1878 |
5 million ounces of silver to Russia |
1881 |
An additional 9 million ounces of silver to Russia as the price of Chinese reoccupation of the Ili valley in northern Xinjiang |
1895 |
200 million ounces of silver to Japan |
1897 |
30 million ounces of silver to Japan, for her withdrawal of troops from Liaodong |
1901 |
450 million silver dollars to the Western allies as the Boxer Indemnity |
1922 |
66 million gold francs to Japan, for her evacuation of part of Shandong |
|
In 1911, army expenditures
alone represented almost 35 percent of the projected national budget of
338 million taels. This budgetary total was already 40 million taels
higher than the deficit budget of 1910. The advisory national assembly,
meeting at Peking, responded by slashing some 30 million taels from the
army budget. Even so, the resulting budgetary deficit was huge and had
to be met by increased agricultural taxes, a wide range of new duties
on tea, wine, salt, and tobacco, higher transit and customs dues, and
special taxes on all real estate and land-registration
deals. ... As if these problems weren’t enough, the very weather
conspired against the Qing. Torrential rains in the Yangzi and Huai
valleys during 1910 and 1911 caused catastrophic flooding, ruined
millions of acres of crops, drove up grain prices, led to hundreds of
thousands of deaths, and forced millions of refugees into major cities
for relief. (SMC, 244-5)
|
 |
 |
Nationalism & Socialism
In
the years between 1905 and 1911, as the Qing edged toward
constitutional reform and tried to strengthen their control over the
New Army and the railways, dissent in China continued to grow. Having
begun to taste the excitement
of new opportunities, assemblymen, overseas students, women, merchants,
urban workers, and troops in the New Army all pushed both local
authorities and the central government to respond more forcefully to
their calls for reform. The government’s failure to meet their varied
demands provoked ever sharper criticism in which new concepts of China
as a nation — and of the socialism that might transform it — began to
emerge. (SMC, 244)
 |
Chinese Marxism
The first discussion of Marx in
a Chinese publication appeared in 1899. ... The attempted Russian
revolution of 1905 was exciting to those Chinese who saw the tsars as
parallel autocrats to the Qing emperors, and stimulated new interest in
Marxist theories, which seemed to offer an opportunity to jolt China
into the modern world. ... In 1906 a summary and partial translation of
Marx’s Communist Manifesto
appeared in Chinese, with a rather more poetic and less violent touch
than in the English or German version. The famous conclusion to the Manifesto, “The proletarians have nothing to lose but their chains. They have a
world to win. WORKING MEN OF ALL COUNTRIES, UNITE!” emerged in Chinese
as “Then the world will be for the common people, and the sounds of
happiness will reach the deepest springs. Ah! Come! People of every
land, how can you not be roused.” (SMC, 247)
Which features of communism might have been attractive to the proponents of reform?
Which features might have been unattractive?
|
|

|
Sun Yat-sen
“The Father of Modern China”
[Then]
there was Sun Yat-sen himself, since 1905 the titular head of the broad
spectrum of “revolutionary” and anti-Qing groups that were lumped
together as the Revolutionary Alliance. Some of his adherents were
drawn to terrorism and preached the use of assassination; most were
completely committed to the idea of a republican revolution. They
implacably opposed the Manchus and, as “nationalists,” they sought
China’s release from what they considered the economic stranglehold of
the West and Japan. Some were also determined socialists who wanted to
move China away from what they saw as its “feudal” past into a new and
advanced level of development that would avoid the ills of the
capitalist system. A good many members of Sun’s alliance were women
with various agendas for strengthening the roles of women within a new
Chinese state. Sun also had strong contacts with secret societies in
southern China. ... By the summer of 1911, the number of active
Revolutionary Alliance members had grown from around 400 in 1905 to
almost 10,000. (SMC, 248-9)
 |
By
1905, nearly ten thousand Chinese students, most of them studying law
or military subjects, were enrolled in Japanese institutions of higher
learning. Confronted with the dramatic proof of Japan's success as a
modernizing nation, many Chinese students felt great disillusionment
with the Qing government's haphazard steps toward reform. The political
activism of these students was stimulated by the presence of seasoned
revolutionarieslike Sun Yat-sen, who had been forced to seek asylum in
Japan after violent protests against the Qing state. In the fall of 1905, the merger of radical student groups established the Revolutionary Alliance (Zhonghua Tongmeng hui),
with Sun Yat-sen as its leaeder. With its headquarters in Tokyo and
branches in the Chinese communities of Singapore, Saigon, Vancouver,
San Francisco, and Chicago, the alliance probably comprised some one
thousand members in its first year of existence. ... |
Since the
beginning of China as a nation, we Chinese have governed our own
country despite occasional interruptions. When China was occasionally
occupied by a foreign race, our ancestors could always in the end drive
these foreigners out, restore the fatherland, and preserve China for
future generations of Chinese. Today when we raise the righteous
standard of revolt in order to expel an alien race that has been
occupying China, we are doing no more than our ancestors have done or
expected us to do. Justice is so much on our side that all Chinese,
once familiarizing themselves with our stand, will have no doubt about
the righteousness of our cause.
There is a difference, however, between our
revolution and the revolutions of our ancestors. The purpose of past
revolutions, such as those conducted by the Mings and the Taipings, was
to restore China to the Chinese, and nothing else. We, on the other
hand, strive not only to expel the ruling aliens and thus restore China
to the Chinese but also to change basically the political and economic
structure of our country. While we cannot describe in detail this new political and economic structure since so much is involved, the basic principle behind it is liberty, equality, and fraternity.
The revolutions of yesterday were revolutions by and for the heroes;
our revolution, on the other hand, is a revolution by and for the
people. In a people’s revolution everyone who believes in the
principles of liberty, equality, and fraternity has an obligation to
participate in it, and the Military Government is merely the means
whereby he can fulfill this revolutionary obligation. In short, the
responsibility of the people and the responsibility of the Military
Government are one and the same, and the accomplishments of the
Military Government are also the accomplishments of the people. Only
when they cooperate fully with each other can our revolutionary goal be
attained.
At this juncture we wish to express candidly
and fully how to make our revolution today and how to govern our
country tomorrow.
1. Expulsion of the Manchus from China. The
Manchus of today were known as the Eastern Barbarians (Donghu) during
bygone years. Toward the end of the Ming dynasty they repeatedly invaded our
border areas and caused great difficulties. Then, taking advantage of the
chaotic situation in China, they marched southward and forcibly occupied our
country. They compelled all Chinese to become their slaves, and those who did
not wish to subjugate themselves were slaughtered, numbering millions. In fact,
we Chinese have not had a country for the past two hundred and sixty years. Now
that the day has finally arrived when the brutal and evil rule by the Manchus
must come to an end, we do not expect much resistance when our righteous army
begins to move. We shall quickly overthrow the Manchu government so as to
restore the sovereignty of China to the Chinese. All the soldiers on the Manchu
side, whether they are Manchus or Chinese, will be pardoned despite their past
crimes if they express repentance and surrender. If they choose to resist the
people’s army, they will be killed without mercy. The same can be also said
about the Chinese who have collaborated with the Manchu government as traitors.
2. Restoration of China to the Chinese. China belongs to
the Chinese who have the right to govern themselves. After the Manchus are
expelled from China, we will have a national government of our own. Those who
choose to follow the example of Shi Jingtang and Wu Sangui will be
crushed.
3. Establishment of a Republic. Since one of the
principles of our revolution is equality, we intend to establish a republic when
we succeed in overthrowing the Manchu regime. In a republic all citizens will
have the right to participate in the government, the president of the republic
will be elected by the people, and the parliament will have deputies elected by
and responsible to their respective constituents. A constitution of the Chinese
Republic will then be formulated, to be observed by all Chinese. Anyone who
entertains the thought of becoming an emperor will be crushed without mercy.
4. Equalization of landownership. The social and economic
structure of China must be so reconstructed that the fruits of labor will be
shared by all Chinese on an equal basis. Every tract of land in China must be
assessed to determine its fair value in monetary terms, and this value belongs
of course, to the landowner. Any added value, which results from social
progress after the revolution, will, however, belong to the nation as a whole
and must be shared by all Chinese. The ultimate goal of a responsible society
is the guarantee of a satisfactory livelihood for all of its members and
everyone, whomever he happens to be, shall have his own means of support, via
gainful employment or some other source. Anyone who attempts to monopolize the
livelihood of others will be ostracized. |
To
attain the four goals as outlined above, we propose a procedure of three
stages. ... [During the first stage, which should not last more than
three years,] the Military Government, in cooperation with the people, will
eradicate all the abuses of the past; with the arrival of the second stage the
Military Government will hand over local administration to the people while
reserving for itself the right of jurisdiction over all matters that concern the
nation as a whole; during the third or final stage [to be
established six years after the nation has been
pacified] the Military Government will cease to exist and
all governmental power will be invested in organs as prescribed in a national
constitution. (DC, 187-90)
The Three Principles of the People Nationalism, Democracy, Livelihood
What
is the standing of our nation in the world? In comparison with other
nations we have the greatest population and the oldest culture, of four
thousand years’ duration. We ought to be advancing in line with the
nations of Europe and America. But the Chinese people have only family
and clan groups; there is no national spirit. ... We are the poorest
and weakest state in the world, occupying the lowest position in
international affairs; the rest of mankind is the carving knife and the
serving dish, while we are the fish and the meat. Our position is now
extremely perilous. (China: Its History and Culture, 178) |
 |
If
we now want to combine the best from China and the best from other
countries and guard against all kinds of abuse in the future, we must
take the three Western governmental powers — the executive,
legislative and judicial; add to them the old Chinese powers of
examination and censorship and make a finished wall, a quintuple-power
government. Such a government will be the most complete and the finest
in the world, and a state with such a government will indeed be of the
people, by the people and for the people. (China: Its History and Culture, 178)
|
 |
What
are the real conditions among Chinese farmers? Although China does not
have great landowners, yet nine out of ten farmers do not own their own
fields. Most of the farming land is in the possession of landlords who
do not do the cultivating themselves. ... We must immediately use
government and law to remedy this grave situation. Unless we can solve
the agrarian problem, there will be no solution for the livelihood
problem. Of the food produced in the fields, sixty percent, according
to our latest rural surveys, goes to the landlord, while only forty
percent goes to the farmer. If this unjust state of affairs continues,
when the farmers become intelligent, who will still be willing to toil
and suffer in the fields? ... If we apply the People’s Livelihood
principle we must make the aim of food production not profit but the
provision of sustenance for all the people. ... The fundamental
difference, then, between the Principle of Livelihood and capitalism is
this: capitalism makes profit its sole aim, while the Principle of
Livelihood makes the nurture of the people its aim. With such a noble
principle we can destroy the old, evil capitalistic system. (China: Its History and Culture, 178-9)
|
|
The
specific series of events that led to the fall of the
two-and-a-half-centuries-old Qing dynasty was triggered by an
accidental bomb explosion in Hankou, one of the three cities that
composed the area of Wuhan, on October 9, 1911. This explosion might
well have remained an isolated and forgotten incident, however, had it
not been for the general agitation over constitutionalism, railways,
the armies, Manchu power, and foreign encroachments. ...
The explosion of
October 9 occurred while a group of [New Army]
revolutionaries were making bombs at their meetinghouse in the Russian
Concession area of Hankou. Like earlier anti-Qing agitators in
Shanghai, they had learned that the institutions of foreign imperialism
could afford a measure of protection from Qing police, but on this
occasion the size of the explosion brought the Russian authorities to
investigate. As the most seriously injured conspirators were rushed to
the hospital by their comrades, the Qing investigators who had been
alerted by the Russians raided the headquarters and found three other
revolutionaries, who were executed immediately. They also obtained the
membership registers of the soldiers and others enrolled in the
revolutionary societies. The revolutionaries understood that unless
they could launch an uprising rapidly, their organization would be
unraveled and many more members would lose their lives. (SMC, 249-50)
Events now moved too swiftly to be controlled by
any individual or political party. On October 22, 1911, the New Army
mutinied in both Shaanxi and Hunan provinces; in the Shaanxi capital of
Xi’an, large numbers of Manchus were massacred, and in Changsha,
commanders loyal to the Qing were killed. In both cases the leading
members of the provincial assemblies expressed their support for the
revolution. During the last week of October, three other provinces rose
against the Manchus. ...
At the end of October, a senior northern general rebuffed the
Qing order that he lead his troops south by rail, instead joining with
a number of other field commanders and issuing a circular telegram of
twelve demands to the Qing court. The critical demands were to
establish a parliament within the year, to promulgate a constitution
through that same parliament, to elect a premier and have him ratified
by the emperor, to deny the emperor all rights of summary execution of
criminals, to declare a general amnesty for all political offenders, to
forbid members of the Manchu imperial clan from serving as cabinet
ministers, and to have the parliament review all international treaties
before they were approved by the emperor. |
Within a week the Qing court had complied with
most of these demands. ... These developments were clearly moving China
toward a constitutional monarchy under Manchu direction — the kind so
long advocated by Kang Youwei
and his supporters — rather than toward the republican form of
government central to the demands of Sun Yat-sen and the Revolutionary
Alliance. (SMC, 252)
|
  |
The Qing court’s position was immeasurably weakened when
Manchu and loyalist troops were defeated in Nanjing in early December
after several weeks of heavy fighting. ... Sun Yat-sen returned to
Shanghai by sea from France on Christmas Day, 1911. Four days later,
the delegates from sixteen provincial assemblies, meeting in Nanjing,
showed their respect for Sun’s leadership and the influence of the
Revolutionary Alliance by electing Sun “provisional president” of the
Chinese republic. He assumed office in Nanjing on January 1, 1912,
inaugurating the existence of the new republic. ... On that same New
Year’s Day, Sun sent a telegram to Yuan Shikai that acknowledged how
weak his own military power base really was. In this telegram, Sun
stated that even though he had accepted the presidency for the time
being, “it is actually waiting for you, and my offer will eventually be
made clear to the world. I hope that you will accept this offer.” (SMC,
253-4)
The final blow to the Qing came at the end of January
1912, when forty-four senior commanders of the Beiyang army sent a
telegram to the Peking cabinet urging the formation of a republic in
China. While the most intransigent Manchu princes retreated to
Manchuria, where they tried to coordinate a resistance, the emperor’s
mother and her close advisers negotiated frantically with Yuan Shikai
and the other Beiyang army leaders for a settlement that would
guarantee their lives and a measure of financial security. When both
Yuan and the senate of the provincial government in Nanjing agreed to
guarantee to the boy emperor and his family the right to continued
residence in the Forbidden City of Peking and ownership of its great
imperial treasures, as well as a stipend of $4 million a year and
protection of all Manchu ancestral temples, the court announced the
abdication of the emperor Puyi on February 12, 1912. (SMC, 254)
Edict of Abdication
February 12, 1912
We (the Emperor) have respectfully received the following Imperial Edict from
Her Imperial Majesty the Empress Dowager Longyu: —
... It is now evident that the hearts of the majority of the people
are in favor of a republican form of government: the provinces of the South were
the first to espouse the cause, and the generals of the North have since pledged
their support. From the preference of the people’s hearts, the Will of Heaven
can be discerned. How could We then bear to oppose the will of the millions for
the glory of one Family! Therefore, observing the tendencies of the age on the
one hand and studying the opinions of the people on the other, We and His
Majesty the Emperor hereby vest the sovereignty in the People and decide in
favor of a republican form of constitutional government. Thus we would gratify
on the one hand the desires of the whole nation who, tired of anarchy, are
desirous of peace, and on the other hand would follow in the footsteps of the
Ancient Sages, who regarded the Throne as the sacred trust of the Nation. (DC, 196) |
|

|
|