HinduismBuddhism Confucianism DaoismShinto  Judaism Christianity Islam
Introduction to World Religions
This course will explore the historical development, principal beliefs, and basic practices of eight of the world’s major religious traditions, namely Judaism, Christianity, Islam, Daoism, Confucianism, Shinto, Hinduism, and Buddhism. Some of the fundamental issues that will frame our investigation are: how different traditions understand and respond to “ultimate reality”; the relationship between “faith” in a source of power beyond oneself and “self-cultivation” as a means of tapping into a source of power that lies within; the relationship between “other-worldly” goals (such as the soul’s fate after death) and “this-worldly” goals (such as the attainment of advanced spiritual states in this life); and finally the significance of “modernity” and “pluralism” — two of the most powerful forces that are likely to affect the evolution of religion in the 21st century.

The distribution of grades for the course is as follows:

Your final grade will ultimately depend on my assessment of your performance in each of the above areas, though the following descriptions should provide you with a rough idea of the defining characteristics of students within particular grade ranges:

APossesses a deep understanding of the major concepts and themes of the course. The “A” student is able to consistently identify and explain key ideas in the readings, develop genuine insights into the broader significance of these concepts, and demonstrate a high level of intellectual engagement in class discussions.
BDemonstrates a serious commitment to the course and a strong grasp of the major concepts and themes but with less depth and/or consistency than the “A” student.
CDemonstrates a reasonable effort to attend class and participate in discussions as well as a basic grasp of the course material.
DDemonstrates a minimal commitment to the course and a weak grasp of basic concepts and themes.
FFails to demonstrate an acceptable degree of effort in the course through low attendance, inability to discuss basic concepts and themes, missed assignments and/or plagiarized work.
 
Divider
Learning Outcomes
By the end of this course, you should be able to:
  • understand the fundamental beliefs and practices of various religious traditions
  • demonstrate a basic understanding of the ethical and social dimensions of religious traditions
  • apply the basic skills associated with the academic study of religion
  • discuss the significance of religious experience
Divider
Class Participation

The Class Participation mark (worth 10% of the final grade) will be based on your ability to demonstrate that you have made a sincere attempt to read and understand the assigned material. Although the quality of your comments will obviously be taken into consideration, all attempts to seriously engage the readings — from sharing your perspective on the material to simply asking a relevant question — will enhance your grade.

Divider
REVEL for Living Religions (10th Edition)

REVEL for Living Religions, 10e is the digital text you'll be using to access assignments throughout the semester. To access your materials, go to console.pearson.com/enrollment/pfavai. Please note that this link is unique to the course: no other version of the text will allow you to complete the online quizzes that are worth 20% of your final grade. If you have any trouble purchasing access to the text, please let me know as soon as possible so that I can work with a Pearson representative to resolve the problem. You will need to read the beginning of Chapter 1 and do the associated online quizzes before our first meeting on August 19 but will not need to write “reflection papers” until Week 2 (see below for details).

Divider

REVEL Quizzes

As you read through the online text, there will be short quizzes at the end of each section and a longer quiz at the end of each chapter. The questions for the short reading quizzes are worth 5 points if you get it right on the first try, 4 points for the second try, and 3 points for the third. For the longer quizzes at the end of the chapter each question is worth 10 on the first try, 7 on the second, and 4 on the third. There are a total of 2520 possible points with 100 points worth 1% for a maximum total of 25%. Quizzes should be completed before class on the assigned due date; you can complete quizzes after the due date, but your mark will be reduced by 50%.

Divider
Reflection Papers

After completing the weekly reading assignment, go to the web syllabus where you will find links to an associated web page. Most pages will have prerecorded mini-lectures as well as relevant information, quotations and images, though some will focus on two “contemporary issues” related to the religious tradition. At the end of each page there will be a question (or two) related to the content, which will help you reflect on the key issues that we will explore in class. There is a total of 26 “reflection papers” (each worth 1% with a 250-word minimum), but you should be able to get the full 20% if you put in a reasonable effort. For example, if you only turn in 23 papers but get a “B” on each, you will end up with 19.55/20; similartly, if you get a “C” on each of the 26 papers, your mark will be 19.5/20. Papers should be submitted on Blackboard (Assignments/Reflection Papers) before class on the assigned day. Since the purpose of these papers is to prepare for class discussions, late submissions will not be accepted. For details regarding grading see the Reflection Paper Rubric below.

Divider
Essay Questions

In order to develop a deeper understanding of religious beliefs, practices, and experiences, you will write a 4-5 page paper (1000-word minimum) on each of these three themes as detailed below. Essay 1 is due before class on August 26; Essays 2 and 3 can be done in either order, but one paper must be turned in by October 11 and the other by December 2. Both must include references (Chicago Style or MLA) to at least two academic sources. Each paper is worth 15% and should be submitted on Blackboard (Assignment); late submissions will be penalized one degree (e.g. from B+ to B) for each day that the paper is late.

Essay 1: Religious Autobiography
Whether one is religious, atheistic, or agnostic, everyone has a “religious autobiography.” Writing your religious autobiography is an opportunity to reflect on your personal history as well as your present beliefs about the meaning and purpose of existence. There is no “correct” formula for completing this assignment: you may want to start with your early childhood and then trace the development of your religious beliefs and practices up to the present; or you may decide to focus on an event in your life that had a profound impact on your religious identity. One way or another, the goal is to show how your personal history has influenced your current perspective on religion. Needless to say, I will not share the content of your paper with anyone else. For more details on the essay requirements see the Religious Autobiography Rubric below.

Essay 2: Religious Practice
In order to develop a deeper understanding of religious practice, you will attend a religious service in a tradition other than one with which you are closely associated and then write a paper based on the experience. You will be expected to include references to a conversation with at least one member of the congregation, so you may want to contact the institution in advance to arrange for a congregant to meet you at the service. Your paper should include a general summary of the service as well as a detailed description of at least one ritual. You should discuss the significance of this ritual for the tradition in question and also how it is similar to and/or different from at least one ritual from another tradition. Finally, you should explain how attending the service and comparing rituals from different traditions enhanced your understanding of religious practice. For more details on the essay requirements see the Religious Practice Rubric below. For a sample of religious establishments in the area see Local Places of Worship.

Essay 3: Contemplative Event
Every term, the Department of Religious Studies hosts a number of “Contemplative Events,” each of which features a brief talk by an experienced practitioner of a particular tradition (religious or secular), followed by a meditative exercise and open discussion. During the term, you will attend at least one of these events and then write a paper based on the experience. In addition to describing the event, your paper should explore the religious significance of the exercise in question. For example, you might explain how the exercise is relevant to the tradition with which it is associated and/or how it relates to the beliefs and practices of another religious tradition. Your paper should conclude with a reflection on how the exercise helped to enrich your understanding of religious experience. For more details on the essay requirements see the Contemplative Event Rubric below. Dates for this term’s Contemplative Events are provided on the syllabus. For more details click here.

Divider

Office Hours, Etc.
225 North Loomis Road, Room 23
Tuesday: 4-5  ~  Wednesday: 4-5 ~ Thursday: 2-5  ~  Friday ( Tea/Talk): 4-5

Phone: 630-637-5619
E-mail: bhoffert@noctrl.edu
Home Page: http://bhoffert.faculty.noctrl.edu

Divider
 

 

Unsatisfactory
0 - .65

Satisfactory
.75

Good
.85

Excellent
.95

MARK

LENGTH

<750 words

750-1000 words

1000-1250 words

>1250 words

2%

STYLE

Excessive stylistic errors (spelling, grammar, sentence construction, etc.).

Ideas are adequately expressed, but there are more than 4 stylistic errors.

Ideas are clearly expressed with no more than 4 stylistic errors.

Ideas are eloquently  expressed with no more than 3 stylistic errors.

3%

EVOLUTION OF RELIGIOUS BELIEFS

The evolution of your religious beliefs is minimally discussed.

The evolution of your religious beliefs is adequately discussed.

The evolution of your religious beliefs is clearly discussed.

The evolution of your religious beliefs is insightfully discussed.

5%

REFLECTION ON RELIGIOUS BELIEFS

Your religious beliefs are not explored in sufficient detail.

The paper exhibits minimal reflection on your religious beliefs.

The paper exhibits genuine reflection on your religious beliefs.

The paper exhibits deep reflection on your religious beliefs.

5%

TOTAL

 

 

 

 

15%

Divider
 

 

Unsatisfactory
0 - .65

Satisfactory
.75

Good
.85

Excellent
.95

MARK

LENGTH

<750 words

750-1000 words

1000-1250 words

>1250 words

2%

STYLE

Excessive stylistic errors (spelling, grammar, sentence construction, etc.).

Ideas are adequately expressed, but there are more than 4 stylistic errors.

Ideas are clearly expressed with no more than 4 stylistic errors.

Ideas are eloquently  expressed with no more than 3 stylistic errors.

3%

CONTACT WITH
CONGREGANT

There is no evidence of contact with a member of the congregation.

 There is minimal evidence of contact with a congregant.

There is evidence of a significant discussion with a congregant.

The discussion with a congregant significantly enhances the paper.

1%
REFERENCES TO ACADEMIC SOURCESThe paper has less than two references.The paper has two references, but they are not “peer-reviewed” or they do not enhance the paper.
The paper has two “peer-reviewed” sources that enhance the paper..The paper is significantly enhanced by more than two “peer-reviewed” sources.2%

DESCRIPTION
OF SERVICE

The religious service is not described in sufficient detail.

The religious service is described in minimal detail.

The religious service is described in appropriate detail.

The description of the religious service significantly enhances the paper.

2%
DESCRIPTION
AND ANALYSIS OF RITUAL
The observed ritual is not described and/or analyzed in sufficient detail.The observed ritual is described and analyzed in minimal detail.The observed ritual is described and analyzed in appropriate detail.The description and analysis of the ritual significantly enhances the paper.3%

REFLECTION ON RELIGIOUS PRACTICE

There is no reflection on the nature of religious practice.

There is minimal reflection on the nature of religious practice.

There is appropriate reflection on the nature of religious practice.

There is substantial reflection on the nature of religious practice.

2%

TOTAL

 

 

 

 

15%

Divider
 

 

Unsatisfactory
0 - .65

Satisfactory
.75

Good
.85

Excellent
.95

MARK

LENGTH

<750 words

750-1000 words

1000-1250 words

>1250 words

2%

STYLE

Excessive stylistic errors (spelling, grammar, sentence construction, etc.).

Ideas are adequately expressed, but there are more than 4 stylistic errors.

Ideas are clearly expressed with no more than 4 stylistic errors.

Ideas are eloquently  expressed with no more than 3 stylistic errors.

3%
REFERENCES TO ACADEMIC SOURCESThe paper has less than two references.The paper has two references, but they are not “peer-reviewed” or they do not enhance the paper.
The paper has two “peer-reviewed” sources that enhance the paper.. The paper is significantly enhanced by more than two “peer-reviewed” sources. 2%

DESCRIPTION
OF EVENT

The event is not described in sufficient detail.

The event is described in minimal detail.

 The event is described in appropriate detail.

The description of the event significantly enhances the paper.

2%

ANALYSIS OF RELIGIOUS SIGNIFICANCE

The religious significance of the contemplative exercise is not explored.

The religious significance of the contemplative exercise is briefly explored.

The religious significance of the contemplative exercise is well explored.

The religious significance of the contemplative exercise is deeply explored.

4%

REFLECTION ON RELIGIOUS SIGNIFICANCE

There is no reflection on the nature of religious experience.

There is minimal reflection on the nature of religious experience.

There is appropriate reflection on the nature of religious experience.

There is substantial reflection on the nature of religious experience.

2%

TOTAL

 

 

 

 

15%

Divider
 

Unsatisfactory
0 - .65

Satisfactory
.75

Good
.85

Excellent
.95

The paper is too short, has excessive stylistic errors and/or does not adequately discuss the issue.

The paper provides a reasonable discussion of the issue but is too short and/or has excessive stylistic errors.

The paper provides a thoughtful reflection on the issue.

The paper develops a substantial insight into the significance of the issue.

Divider